GHSA-5HH8-598F-9J69
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-04-30 18:20 – Updated: 2022-04-30 18:20
VLAI?
Details
Remote Data Protocol (RDP) version 5.0 in Microsoft Windows 2000 and RDP 5.1 in Windows XP does not encrypt the checksums of plaintext session data, which could allow a remote attacker to determine the contents of encrypted sessions via sniffing, aka "Weak Encryption in RDP Protocol."
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2002-0863"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2002-10-11T04:00:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Remote Data Protocol (RDP) version 5.0 in Microsoft Windows 2000 and RDP 5.1 in Windows XP does not encrypt the checksums of plaintext session data, which could allow a remote attacker to determine the contents of encrypted sessions via sniffing, aka \"Weak Encryption in RDP Protocol.\"",
"id": "GHSA-5hh8-598f-9j69",
"modified": "2022-04-30T18:20:05Z",
"published": "2022-04-30T18:20:05Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2002-0863"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2002/ms02-051"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A199"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=103235960119404\u0026w=2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=103236181522253\u0026w=2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.iss.net/security_center/static/10121.php"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.iss.net/security_center/static/10122.php"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/865833"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/5711"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/5712"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…