GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-5HXM-7WCJ-79FV

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-11 21:31 – Updated: 2026-09-13 09:32
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ring-buffer: Stop remote reader update when page swap fails

The remote swap_reader_page callback can return -EBUSY when the writer moves the head before the remote catches it, particularly during an event storm on a small buffer. __rb_get_reader_page_from_remote() currently warns about that failure but continues with the unchanged reader ID and rearranges the local page list as though the swap succeeded.

Handle the callback failure as a recoverable error. Report it with pr_warn_ratelimited() and return NULL. Callers already handle a NULL reader page as a failed attempt. This avoids splicing the same page as both the previous and new reader without flooding the log under contention.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-89499"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-09-11T20:19:32Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nring-buffer: Stop remote reader update when page swap fails\n\nThe remote swap_reader_page callback can return -EBUSY when the writer\nmoves the head before the remote catches it, particularly during an event\nstorm on a small buffer. __rb_get_reader_page_from_remote() currently\nwarns about that failure but continues with the unchanged reader ID and\nrearranges the local page list as though the swap succeeded.\n\nHandle the callback failure as a recoverable error. Report it with\npr_warn_ratelimited() and return NULL. Callers already handle a NULL reader\npage as a failed attempt. This avoids splicing the same page as both the\nprevious and new reader without flooding the log under contention.",
  "id": "GHSA-5hxm-7wcj-79fv",
  "modified": "2026-09-13T09:32:14Z",
  "published": "2026-09-11T21:31:29Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-89499"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5eab74874d11160725c42ab676ba97a797a362eb"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a14a97048e48471e283d76879b83d2ae323e0722"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…