GHSA-5JHG-R53R-XQCR
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 03:54 – Updated: 2022-05-14 03:54
VLAI?
Details
tif_write.c in libtiff 4.0.6 has an issue in the error code path of TIFFFlushData1() that didn't reset the tif_rawcc and tif_rawcp members. Reported as MSVR 35095, aka "TIFFFlushData1 heap-buffer-overflow."
Severity ?
9.8 (Critical)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2016-9534"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2016-11-22T19:59:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "tif_write.c in libtiff 4.0.6 has an issue in the error code path of TIFFFlushData1() that didn\u0027t reset the tif_rawcc and tif_rawcp members. Reported as MSVR 35095, aka \"TIFFFlushData1 heap-buffer-overflow.\"",
"id": "GHSA-5jhg-r53r-xqcr",
"modified": "2022-05-14T03:54:59Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T03:54:59Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-9534"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/vadz/libtiff/commit/83a4b92815ea04969d494416eaae3d4c6b338e4a#diff-5be5ce02d0dea67050d5b2a10102d1ba"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0225.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3762"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94484"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94743"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…