GHSA-5PM5-3FX7-4F4R

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-02-14 15:32 – Updated: 2026-03-18 15:30
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

perf: Fix refcount warning on event->mmap_count increment

When calling refcount_inc(&event->mmap_count) inside perf_mmap_rb(), the following warning is triggered:

    refcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free.
    WARNING: lib/refcount.c:25

PoC:

struct perf_event_attr attr = {0};
int fd = syscall(__NR_perf_event_open, &attr, 0, -1, -1, 0);
mmap(NULL, 0x3000, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
int victim = syscall(__NR_perf_event_open, &attr, 0, -1, fd,
                     PERF_FLAG_FD_OUTPUT);
mmap(NULL, 0x3000, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, victim, 0);

This occurs when creating a group member event with the flag PERF_FLAG_FD_OUTPUT. The group leader should be mmap-ed and then mmap-ing the event triggers the warning.

Since the event has copied the output_event in perf_event_set_output(), event->rb is set. As a result, perf_mmap_rb() calls refcount_inc(&event->mmap_count) when event->mmap_count = 0.

Disallow the case when event->mmap_count = 0. This also prevents two events from updating the same user_page.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-23127"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-02-14T15:16:07Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nperf: Fix refcount warning on event-\u003emmap_count increment\n\nWhen calling refcount_inc(\u0026event-\u003emmap_count) inside perf_mmap_rb(), the\nfollowing warning is triggered:\n\n        refcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free.\n        WARNING: lib/refcount.c:25\n\nPoC:\n\n    struct perf_event_attr attr = {0};\n    int fd = syscall(__NR_perf_event_open, \u0026attr, 0, -1, -1, 0);\n    mmap(NULL, 0x3000, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);\n    int victim = syscall(__NR_perf_event_open, \u0026attr, 0, -1, fd,\n                         PERF_FLAG_FD_OUTPUT);\n    mmap(NULL, 0x3000, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, victim, 0);\n\nThis occurs when creating a group member event with the flag\nPERF_FLAG_FD_OUTPUT. The group leader should be mmap-ed and then mmap-ing\nthe event triggers the warning.\n\nSince the event has copied the output_event in perf_event_set_output(),\nevent-\u003erb is set. As a result, perf_mmap_rb() calls\nrefcount_inc(\u0026event-\u003emmap_count) when event-\u003emmap_count = 0.\n\nDisallow the case when event-\u003emmap_count = 0. This also prevents two\nevents from updating the same user_page.",
  "id": "GHSA-5pm5-3fx7-4f4r",
  "modified": "2026-03-18T15:30:40Z",
  "published": "2026-02-14T15:32:19Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23127"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/23c0e4bd93d0b250775162faf456470485ac9fc7"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d06bf78e55d5159c1b00072e606ab924ffbbad35"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…