ghsa-5qfx-g363-pvpg
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:14
Modified
2022-05-13 01:14
Severity ?
Details
The IPMI 2.0 specification supports RMCP+ Authenticated Key-Exchange Protocol (RAKP) authentication, which allows remote attackers to obtain password hashes and conduct offline password guessing attacks by obtaining the HMAC from a RAKP message 2 response from a BMC.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2013-4786" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2013-07-08T22:55:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "The IPMI 2.0 specification supports RMCP+ Authenticated Key-Exchange Protocol (RAKP) authentication, which allows remote attackers to obtain password hashes and conduct offline password guessing attacks by obtaining the HMAC from a RAKP message 2 response from a BMC.", "id": "GHSA-5qfx-g363-pvpg", "modified": "2022-05-13T01:14:01Z", "published": "2022-05-13T01:14:01Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-4786" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://community.rapid7.com/community/metasploit/blog/2013/07/02/a-penetration-testers-guide-to-ipmi" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://nvidia.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/5010" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20190919-0005" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://support.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docLocale=en_US\u0026docId=emr_na-c04197764" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://fish2.com/ipmi/remote-pw-cracking.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=139653661621384\u0026w=2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuapr2016v3-2985753.html" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.