GHSA-5RRC-CM4J-679M
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-04-30 18:17 – Updated: 2022-04-30 18:17
VLAI?
Details
Buffer overflow in the GUI authentication code of Check Point VPN-1/FireWall-1 Management Server 4.0 and 4.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long user name.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2001-0940"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2001-09-21T04:00:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Buffer overflow in the GUI authentication code of Check Point VPN-1/FireWall-1 Management Server 4.0 and 4.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long user name.",
"id": "GHSA-5rrc-cm4j-679m",
"modified": "2022-04-30T18:17:01Z",
"published": "2022-04-30T18:17:01Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2001-0940"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/7145"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/win2ksecadvice/2001-q3/0151.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://cert.uni-stuttgart.de/archive/bugtraq/2001/11/msg00291.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=100094268017271\u0026w=2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=100698954308436\u0026w=2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.checkpoint.com/techsupport/alerts/buffer_overflow.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.osvdb.org/1951"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/3336"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…