GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-5VP3-3CG6-2RQ3

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-24 19:22 – Updated: 2026-03-24 19:22
VLAI
Summary
JustHTML is vulnerable to XSS via code fence breakout in <pre> content
Details

Summary

to_markdown() is vulnerable when serializing attacker-controlled <pre> content. The <pre> handler emits a fixed three-backtick fenced code block, but writes decoded text content into that fence without choosing a delimiter longer than any backtick run inside the content.

An attacker can place backticks and HTML-like text inside a sanitized <pre> element so that the generated Markdown closes the fence early and leaves raw HTML outside the code block. When that Markdown is rendered by a CommonMark/GFM-style renderer that allows raw HTML, the HTML executes.

This is a bypass of the v1.12.0 Markdown hardening. That fix escaped HTML-significant characters for regular text nodes, but <pre> uses a separate serialization path and does not apply the same protection.

Details

The vulnerable <pre> Markdown path:

  • extracts decoded text from the <pre> subtree
  • opens a fenced block with a fixed delimiter of ``````
  • writes the decoded text directly into the output
  • closes with another fixed ``````

Because the fence length is fixed, attacker-controlled content containing a backtick run of length 3 or more can terminate the code block. If the content also contains decoded HTML-like text such as &lt;img ...&gt;, that text appears outside the fence in the resulting Markdown and is treated as raw HTML by downstream Markdown renderers.

The issue is not that HTML-like text appears inside code blocks. The issue is that the serializer allows attacker-controlled <pre> text to break out of the fixed fence.

Reproduction

from justhtml import JustHTML

payload = "<pre>&#96;&#96;&#96;\n&lt;img src=x onerror=alert(1)&gt;</pre>"
doc = JustHTML(payload, fragment=True)  # default sanitize=True

print(doc.to_html(pretty=False))
# <pre>```
# &lt;img src=x onerror=alert(1)&gt;</pre>

print(doc.to_markdown())
# ```
# ```
# <img src=x onerror=alert(1)>
# ```

Rendered as CommonMark/GFM-style Markdown, that output is interpreted as:

  1. Line 1 opens a fenced code block
  2. Line 2 closes it
  3. Line 3 is raw HTML outside the fence
  4. Line 4 opens a new fence

Impact

Applications that treat JustHTML(..., sanitize=True).to_markdown() output as safe for direct rendering in Markdown contexts may be exposed to XSS, depending on the downstream Markdown renderer's raw-HTML handling.

Root Cause

The <pre> Markdown serializer uses a fixed fence instead of selecting a delimiter longer than the longest backtick run in the content.

Fix

When serializing <pre> content to Markdown, choose a fence length longer than any backtick run present in the code block content, with a minimum length of 3.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 1.12.0"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "justhtml"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.13.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-79",
      "CWE-80"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-24T19:22:21Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "## Summary\n\n`to_markdown()` is vulnerable when serializing attacker-controlled `\u003cpre\u003e` content. The `\u003cpre\u003e` handler emits a fixed three-backtick fenced code block, but writes decoded text content into that fence without choosing a delimiter longer than any backtick run inside the content.\n\nAn attacker can place backticks and HTML-like text inside a sanitized `\u003cpre\u003e` element so that the generated Markdown closes the fence early and leaves raw HTML outside the code block. When that Markdown is rendered by a CommonMark/GFM-style renderer that allows raw HTML, the HTML executes.\n\nThis is a bypass of the v1.12.0 Markdown hardening. That fix escaped HTML-significant characters for regular text nodes, but `\u003cpre\u003e` uses a separate serialization path and does not apply the same protection.\n\n## Details\n\nThe vulnerable `\u003cpre\u003e` Markdown path:\n\n- extracts decoded text from the `\u003cpre\u003e` subtree\n- opens a fenced block with a fixed delimiter of ``````\n- writes the decoded text directly into the output\n- closes with another fixed ``````\n\nBecause the fence length is fixed, attacker-controlled content containing a backtick run of length 3 or more can terminate the code block. If the content also contains decoded HTML-like text such as `\u0026lt;img ...\u0026gt;`, that text appears outside the fence in the resulting Markdown and is treated as raw HTML by downstream Markdown renderers.\n\nThe issue is not that HTML-like text appears inside code blocks. The issue is that the serializer allows attacker-controlled `\u003cpre\u003e` text to break out of the fixed fence.\n\n## Reproduction\n\n```python\nfrom justhtml import JustHTML\n\npayload = \"\u003cpre\u003e\u0026#96;\u0026#96;\u0026#96;\\n\u0026lt;img src=x onerror=alert(1)\u0026gt;\u003c/pre\u003e\"\ndoc = JustHTML(payload, fragment=True)  # default sanitize=True\n\nprint(doc.to_html(pretty=False))\n# \u003cpre\u003e```\n# \u0026lt;img src=x onerror=alert(1)\u0026gt;\u003c/pre\u003e\n\nprint(doc.to_markdown())\n# ```\n# ```\n# \u003cimg src=x onerror=alert(1)\u003e\n# ```\n\n```\n\nRendered as CommonMark/GFM-style Markdown, that output is interpreted as:\n\n1. Line 1 opens a fenced code block\n2. Line 2 closes it\n3. Line 3 is raw HTML outside the fence\n4. Line 4 opens a new fence\n\n## Impact\n\nApplications that treat `JustHTML(..., sanitize=True).to_markdown()` output as safe for direct rendering in Markdown contexts may be exposed to XSS, depending on the downstream Markdown renderer\u0027s raw-HTML handling.\n\n## Root Cause\n\nThe `\u003cpre\u003e` Markdown serializer uses a fixed fence instead of selecting a delimiter longer than the longest backtick run in the content.\n\n## Fix\n\nWhen serializing `\u003cpre\u003e` content to Markdown, choose a fence length longer than any backtick run present in the code block content, with a minimum length of 3.",
  "id": "GHSA-5vp3-3cg6-2rq3",
  "modified": "2026-03-24T19:22:21Z",
  "published": "2026-03-24T19:22:21Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/EmilStenstrom/justhtml/security/advisories/GHSA-5vp3-3cg6-2rq3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/EmilStenstrom/justhtml/commit/f35f8f723c713bd8f912d86e9ec6881275ff5af9"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/EmilStenstrom/justhtml"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/EmilStenstrom/justhtml/releases/tag/v1.13.0"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "JustHTML is vulnerable to XSS via code fence breakout in \u003cpre\u003e content"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…