GHSA-5XCV-V8FH-PCRC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-04-30 18:21 – Updated: 2022-04-30 18:21
VLAI?
Details
Integer overflow in imapparse.c for Cyrus IMAP server 1.4 and 2.1.10 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a large length value that facilitates a buffer overflow attack, a different vulnerability than CVE-2002-1347.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2002-1580"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2004-06-14T04:00:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Integer overflow in imapparse.c for Cyrus IMAP server 1.4 and 2.1.10 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a large length value that facilitates a buffer overflow attack, a different vulnerability than CVE-2002-1347.",
"id": "GHSA-5xcv-v8fh-pcrc",
"modified": "2022-04-30T18:21:27Z",
"published": "2022-04-30T18:21:27Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2002-1580"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/10744"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/download/imapd/changes.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://distro.conectiva.com.br/atualizacoes/?id=a\u0026anuncio=000557"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://distro.conectiva.com/atualizacoes/?id=a\u0026anuncio=000557"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2002/dsa-215"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/740169"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/301864"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/6298"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…