GHSA-5XF5-GQ7P-JFX7

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-02-14 18:30 – Updated: 2026-02-14 18:30
VLAI?
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

spi: tegra210-quad: Protect curr_xfer check in IRQ handler

Now that all other accesses to curr_xfer are done under the lock, protect the curr_xfer NULL check in tegra_qspi_isr_thread() with the spinlock. Without this protection, the following race can occur:

CPU0 (ISR thread) CPU1 (timeout path) ---------------- ------------------- if (!tqspi->curr_xfer) // sees non-NULL spin_lock() tqspi->curr_xfer = NULL spin_unlock() handle_*_xfer() spin_lock() t = tqspi->curr_xfer // NULL! ... t->len ... // NULL dereference!

With this patch, all curr_xfer accesses are now properly synchronized.

Although all accesses to curr_xfer are done under the lock, in tegra_qspi_isr_thread() it checks for NULL, releases the lock and reacquires it later in handle_cpu_based_xfer()/handle_dma_based_xfer(). There is a potential for an update in between, which could cause a NULL pointer dereference.

To handle this, add a NULL check inside the handlers after acquiring the lock. This ensures that if the timeout path has already cleared curr_xfer, the handler will safely return without dereferencing the NULL pointer.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-23207"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-02-14T17:15:58Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nspi: tegra210-quad: Protect curr_xfer check in IRQ handler\n\nNow that all other accesses to curr_xfer are done under the lock,\nprotect the curr_xfer NULL check in tegra_qspi_isr_thread() with the\nspinlock. Without this protection, the following race can occur:\n\n  CPU0 (ISR thread)              CPU1 (timeout path)\n  ----------------               -------------------\n  if (!tqspi-\u003ecurr_xfer)\n    // sees non-NULL\n                                 spin_lock()\n                                 tqspi-\u003ecurr_xfer = NULL\n                                 spin_unlock()\n  handle_*_xfer()\n    spin_lock()\n    t = tqspi-\u003ecurr_xfer  // NULL!\n    ... t-\u003elen ...        // NULL dereference!\n\nWith this patch, all curr_xfer accesses are now properly synchronized.\n\nAlthough all accesses to curr_xfer are done under the lock, in\ntegra_qspi_isr_thread() it checks for NULL, releases the lock and\nreacquires it later in handle_cpu_based_xfer()/handle_dma_based_xfer().\nThere is a potential for an update in between, which could cause a NULL\npointer dereference.\n\nTo handle this, add a NULL check inside the handlers after acquiring\nthe lock. This ensures that if the timeout path has already cleared\ncurr_xfer, the handler will safely return without dereferencing the\nNULL pointer.",
  "id": "GHSA-5xf5-gq7p-jfx7",
  "modified": "2026-02-14T18:30:16Z",
  "published": "2026-02-14T18:30:16Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23207"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2ac3a105e51496147c0e44e49466eecfcc532d57"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/edf9088b6e1d6d88982db7eb5e736a0e4fbcc09e"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…