GHSA-625G-FM5W-W7W4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-01-04 17:20 – Updated: 2024-01-04 17:20Dear Sirs and Madams,
I would like to report a business logic error vulnerability that I discovered during my recent penetration test on Froxlor.
Specifically, I identified an issue where it was possible to submit the registration form with the essential fields, such as the username and password, left intentionally blank. This inadvertent omission allowed for a bypass of the mandatory field requirements established by the system.
The surname, family name AND company name all of them can be left blank.
I believe addressing this vulnerability is crucial to ensure the security and integrity of the Froxlor platform.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
This action served as a means to bypass the mandatory field requirements.
Lets see (please have a look at the Video -> attachment).
as you can see i was able to let the username and second name blank.
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/80028768/289675319-81ae8ebe-1308-4ee3-bedb-43cdc40da474.mp4
Lets see again.
Only the company name is set.
Thank you for your time

{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 2.1.1"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "froxlor/froxlor"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.1.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-50256"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-20"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2024-01-04T17:20:03Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2024-01-03T23:15:08Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Dear Sirs and Madams,\n\nI would like to report a business logic error vulnerability that I discovered during my recent penetration test on Froxlor.\n\nSpecifically, I identified an issue where it was possible to submit the registration form with the essential fields, such as the username and password, left intentionally blank. This inadvertent omission allowed for a bypass of the mandatory field requirements established by the system.\n\nThe surname, family name AND company name all of them can be left blank.\n\nI believe addressing this vulnerability is crucial to ensure the security and integrity of the Froxlor platform.\n\nThank you for your attention to this matter.\n\nThis action served as a means to bypass the mandatory field requirements.\n\nLets see (please have a look at the Video -\u003e attachment).\n\n----------------\n\nas you can see i was able to let the username and second name blank. \n\nhttps://user-images.githubusercontent.com/80028768/289675319-81ae8ebe-1308-4ee3-bedb-43cdc40da474.mp4\n\n\nLets see again.\n\nOnly the company name is set. \n\nThank you for your time\n\n\n\n",
"id": "GHSA-625g-fm5w-w7w4",
"modified": "2024-01-04T17:20:03Z",
"published": "2024-01-04T17:20:03Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/Froxlor/Froxlor/security/advisories/GHSA-625g-fm5w-w7w4"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-50256"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/Froxlor/Froxlor/commit/4b1846883d4828962add91bd844596d89a9c7cac"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/Froxlor/Froxlor"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/80028768/289675319-81ae8ebe-1308-4ee3-bedb-43cdc40da474.mp4"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Froxlor username/surname AND company field Bypass"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.