ghsa-62vx-cpv3-rc46
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 07:18
Modified
2022-05-01 07:18
Details

Joomla! before 1.0.11 omits some checks for whether _VALID_MOS is defined, which allows attackers to have an unknown impact, possibly resulting in PHP remote file inclusion.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2006-4470"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2006-08-31T20:04:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Joomla! before 1.0.11 omits some checks for whether _VALID_MOS is defined, which allows attackers to have an unknown impact, possibly resulting in PHP remote file inclusion.",
  "id": "GHSA-62vx-cpv3-rc46",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T07:18:57Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T07:18:57Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-4470"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/28631"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/21666"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.joomla.org/content/view/1841/78"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.joomla.org/content/view/1843/74"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/3408"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.