GHSA-62X7-6PJW-J8FH

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 05:32 – Updated: 2022-05-17 05:32
VLAI?
Details

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the management interface in FreeIPA before 2.1.4 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that make configuration changes.

Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2011-3636"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2011-12-08T11:55:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the management interface in FreeIPA before 2.1.4 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that make configuration changes.",
  "id": "GHSA-62x7-6pjw-j8fh",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T05:32:37Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T05:32:37Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-3636"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011:1533"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2011-3636"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747710"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://freeipa.org/page/IPAv2_214"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.