GHSA-63V7-HQPP-9687
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 05:47 – Updated: 2022-05-17 05:47
VLAI?
Details
The fr_dhcp_decode function in lib/dhcp.c in FreeRADIUS 2.1.9, in certain non-default builds, does not properly handle the DHCP Relay Agent Information option, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop and daemon outage) via a packet that has more than one sub-option. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2010-3696"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2010-10-07T21:00:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The fr_dhcp_decode function in lib/dhcp.c in FreeRADIUS 2.1.9, in certain non-default builds, does not properly handle the DHCP Relay Agent Information option, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop and daemon outage) via a packet that has more than one sub-option. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information.",
"id": "GHSA-63v7-hqpp-9687",
"modified": "2022-05-17T05:47:54Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T05:47:54Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-3696"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugs.freeradius.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639390"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://freeradius.org/press/index.html#2.1.10"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://github.com/alandekok/freeradius-server/commit/4dc7800b866f889a1247685bbaa6dd4238a56279"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/41621"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/10/01/3"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/10/01/8"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…