GHSA-64H2-GCQJ-XWFC

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-10-11 18:32 – Updated: 2024-10-11 18:32
VLAI?
Details

An Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in the routing protocol daemon (RPD) of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows an unauthenticated, network based attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS). 

In a scenario where BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP) is configured with rib-in pre-policy monitoring, receiving a BGP update with a specifically malformed AS PATH attribute over an established BGP session, can cause an RPD crash and restart.

This issue affects:

Junos OS: 

  • All versions before 21.2R3-S8,
  • 21.4 versions before 21.4R3-S8,
  • 22.2 versions before 22.2R3-S4,
  • 22.3 versions before 22.3R3-S3,
  • 22.4 versions before 22.4R3-S2,
  • 23.2 versions before 23.2R2-S1,
  • 23.4 versions before 23.4R1-S2, 23.4R2;

Junos OS Evolved:

  • All versions before 21.2R3-S8-EVO,
  • 21.4 versions before 21.4R3-S8-EVO,
  • 22.2 versions before 22.2R3-S4-EVO,
  • 22.3 versions before 22.3R3-S3-EVO,
  • 22.4 versions before 22.4R3-S2-EVO,
  • 23.2 versions before 23.2R2-S1-EVO,
  • 23.4 versions before 23.4R1-S2-EVO, 23.4R2-EVO.
Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-47499"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-754"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-10-11T16:15:10Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "An Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in the routing protocol daemon (RPD) of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows an unauthenticated, network based attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS).\u00a0\n\nIn a scenario where BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP) is configured with rib-in pre-policy monitoring, receiving a BGP update with a specifically malformed AS PATH attribute over an established BGP session, can cause an RPD crash and restart.\n\nThis issue affects:\n\nJunos OS:\u00a0\n\n\n\n  *  All versions before 21.2R3-S8,\n  *  21.4 versions before 21.4R3-S8,\n  *  22.2 versions before 22.2R3-S4,\n  *  22.3 versions before 22.3R3-S3,\n  *  22.4 versions before 22.4R3-S2,\n  *  23.2 versions before 23.2R2-S1,\n  *  23.4 versions before 23.4R1-S2, 23.4R2;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nJunos OS Evolved:\n\n\n\n\n  *  All versions before 21.2R3-S8-EVO,\n  *  21.4 versions before 21.4R3-S8-EVO,\n  *  22.2 versions before 22.2R3-S4-EVO,\n  *  22.3 versions before 22.3R3-S3-EVO,\n  *  22.4 versions before 22.4R3-S2-EVO,\n  *  23.2 versions before 23.2R2-S1-EVO,\n  *  23.4 versions before 23.4R1-S2-EVO, 23.4R2-EVO.",
  "id": "GHSA-64h2-gcqj-xwfc",
  "modified": "2024-10-11T18:32:49Z",
  "published": "2024-10-11T18:32:49Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47499"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://supportportal.juniper.net/JSA88129"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:A/V:X/RE:M/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…