ghsa-64x6-q8pq-xjmg
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 02:58
Modified
2022-05-17 02:58
Severity ?
Details
The HTTP/2 protocol does not consider the role of the TCP congestion window in providing information about content length, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain cleartext data by leveraging a web-browser configuration in which third-party cookies are sent, aka a "HEIST" attack.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2016-7153" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-200" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2016-09-06T10:59:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "The HTTP/2 protocol does not consider the role of the TCP congestion window in providing information about content length, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain cleartext data by leveraging a web-browser configuration in which third-party cookies are sent, aka a \"HEIST\" attack.", "id": "GHSA-64x6-q8pq-xjmg", "modified": "2022-05-17T02:58:38Z", "published": "2022-05-17T02:58:38Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-7153" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://tom.vg/papers/heist_blackhat2016.pdf" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://arstechnica.com/security/2016/08/new-attack-steals-ssns-e-mail-addresses-and-more-from-https-pages" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92773" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1036741" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1036742" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1036743" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1036744" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1036745" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1036746" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.