ghsa-652h-xwhf-q4h6
Vulnerability from github
Published
2021-09-21 16:50
Modified
2024-02-12 15:03
Severity ?
Summary
OS Command Injection in ssh2
Details
ssh2 is client and server modules written in pure JavaScript for node.js. In ssh2 before version 1.4.0 there is a command injection vulnerability. The issue only exists on Windows. This issue may lead to remote code execution if a client of the library calls the vulnerable method with untrusted input. This is fixed in version 1.4.0.
{ "affected": [ { "package": { "ecosystem": "npm", "name": "ssh2" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "0" }, { "fixed": "1.4.0" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] } ], "aliases": [ "CVE-2020-26301" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-78" ], "github_reviewed": true, "github_reviewed_at": "2021-09-21T14:50:54Z", "nvd_published_at": "2021-09-20T20:15:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "ssh2 is client and server modules written in pure JavaScript for node.js. In ssh2 before version 1.4.0 there is a command injection vulnerability. The issue only exists on Windows. This issue may lead to remote code execution if a client of the library calls the vulnerable method with untrusted input. This is fixed in version 1.4.0.", "id": "GHSA-652h-xwhf-q4h6", "modified": "2024-02-12T15:03:29Z", "published": "2021-09-21T16:50:46Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-26301" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/mscdex/ssh2/commit/f763271f41320e71d5cbee02ea5bc6a2ded3ca21" }, { "type": "PACKAGE", "url": "https://github.com/mscdex/ssh2" }, { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://securitylab.github.com/advisories/GHSL-2020-123-mscdex-ssh2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.npmjs.com/package/ssh2" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ], "summary": "OS Command Injection in ssh2" }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.