GHSA-65HR-MFQ3-4RJR

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 01:43 – Updated: 2022-05-14 01:43
VLAI?
Details

The privilege-dropping implementation in the (1) pam_env and (2) pam_mail modules in Linux-PAM (aka pam) 1.1.2 does not check the return value of the setfsuid system call, which might allow local users to obtain sensitive information by leveraging an unintended uid, as demonstrated by a symlink attack on the .pam_environment file in a user's home directory. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2010-3435.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2010-3431"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2011-01-24T18:00:00Z",
    "severity": "LOW"
  },
  "details": "The privilege-dropping implementation in the (1) pam_env and (2) pam_mail modules in Linux-PAM (aka pam) 1.1.2 does not check the return value of the setfsuid system call, which might allow local users to obtain sensitive information by leveraging an unintended uid, as demonstrated by a symlink attack on the .pam_environment file in a user\u0027s home directory.  NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2010-3435.",
  "id": "GHSA-65hr-mfq3-4rjr",
  "modified": "2022-05-14T01:43:40Z",
  "published": "2022-05-14T01:43:40Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-3431"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641361"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://git.altlinux.org/people/ldv/packages/?p=pam.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=843807a3a90f52e7538be756616510730a24739a"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://git.altlinux.org/people/ldv/packages/?p=pam.git;a=commit;h=843807a3a90f52e7538be756616510730a24739a"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/21/10"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/21/3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/21/8"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/21/9"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/27/10"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/27/4"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/27/5"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/27/7"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/10/03/1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/10/25/2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/49711"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201206-31.xml"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/21/11"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/24/2"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…