GHSA-65VQ-X599-5XRG

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-02 03:17 – Updated: 2022-05-02 03:17
VLAI?
Details

Cisco Application Networking Manager (ANM) before 2.0 uses default usernames and passwords, which makes it easier for remote attackers to access the application, or cause a denial of service via configuration changes, related to "default user credentials during installation."

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2009-0616"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2009-02-26T16:17:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Cisco Application Networking Manager (ANM) before 2.0 uses default usernames and passwords, which makes it easier for remote attackers to access the application, or cause a denial of service via configuration changes, related to \"default user credentials during installation.\"",
  "id": "GHSA-65vq-x599-5xrg",
  "modified": "2022-05-02T03:17:00Z",
  "published": "2022-05-02T03:17:00Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-0616"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a0080a7bc84.shtml"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/33903"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1021771"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…