ghsa-65w5-rcgr-gxgj
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-24 17:01
Modified
2022-05-24 17:01
Details
The snprintf implementation in PostgreSQL before 9.0.20, 9.1.x before 9.1.16, 9.2.x before 9.2.11, 9.3.x before 9.3.7, and 9.4.x before 9.4.2 does not properly handle system-call errors, which allows attackers to obtain sensitive information or have other unspecified impact via unknown vectors, as demonstrated by an out-of-memory error.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2015-3166"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2019-11-20T21:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The snprintf implementation in PostgreSQL before 9.0.20, 9.1.x before 9.1.16, 9.2.x before 9.2.11, 9.3.x before 9.3.7, and 9.4.x before 9.4.2 does not properly handle system-call errors, which allows attackers to obtain sensitive information or have other unspecified impact via unknown vectors, as demonstrated by an out-of-memory error.",
"id": "GHSA-65w5-rcgr-gxgj",
"modified": "2022-05-24T17:01:35Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:01:35Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-3166"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://ubuntu.com/usn/usn-2621-1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3269"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3270"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.postgresql.org/about/news/1587"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/release-9-0-20.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/release-9-1-16.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/release-9-2-11.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/release-9-3-7.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/static/release-9-4-2.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading...
Loading...
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.