GHSA-66J4-C66H-JM7X

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-15 06:32 – Updated: 2026-08-17 06:33
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ipv4: fib: Don't ignore error route in local/main tables.

When CONFIG_IP_MULTIPLE_TABLES is enabled but no rule is added, fib_lookup() performs route lookup directly on two tables.

Since the first lookup does not properly bail out, the result of an error route in the merged local/main table could be overwritten by another route in the default table:

# unshare -n # ip link set lo up # ip route add 192.168.0.0/24 dev lo table 253 # ip route add unreachable 192.168.0.0/24 # ip route get 192.168.0.1 192.168.0.1 dev lo table default uid 0 cache

Once a random rule is added, the error route is respected:

# ip rule add table 0 # ip rule del table 0 # ip route get 192.168.0.1 RTNETLINK answers: No route to host

Let's fix the inconsistent behaviour.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-72421"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-15T06:22:15Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nipv4: fib: Don\u0027t ignore error route in local/main tables.\n\nWhen CONFIG_IP_MULTIPLE_TABLES is enabled but no rule is added,\nfib_lookup() performs route lookup directly on two tables.\n\nSince the first lookup does not properly bail out, the result\nof an error route in the merged local/main table could be\noverwritten by another route in the default table:\n\n  # unshare -n\n  # ip link set lo up\n  # ip route add 192.168.0.0/24 dev lo table 253\n  # ip route add unreachable 192.168.0.0/24\n  # ip route get 192.168.0.1\n  192.168.0.1 dev lo table default uid 0\n      cache \u003clocal\u003e\n\nOnce a random rule is added, the error route is respected:\n\n  # ip rule add table 0\n  # ip rule del table 0\n  # ip route get 192.168.0.1\n  RTNETLINK answers: No route to host\n\nLet\u0027s fix the inconsistent behaviour.",
  "id": "GHSA-66j4-c66h-jm7x",
  "modified": "2026-08-17T06:33:29Z",
  "published": "2026-08-15T06:32:23Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-72421"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/49eaf1403201357762d745a35882fb734107d763"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5ae18d87a45698e8244d0fcba64c658c35a7dd3d"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/828fad4fd418bcdb9f5d66fec0d184c52a85ec31"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9127589aabdee588278e8d0d0bd3709a760a92c8"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a29e95fbc51e8a1b932773fd0e259b2080881443"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a668fa160247d7bbe921548cb845f607b8b9305f"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b72f0db64205d9ce462038ba995d5d31eff32dc1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fd25996f57a95d56bc568c89b4921edcf334b7d8"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…