ghsa-66rr-2jf5-q2c5
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 03:41
Modified
2022-05-17 03:41
Details

The TLS implementation in HPE Integrated Lights-Out 3 (aka iLO3) firmware before 1.88 does not properly use a MAC protection mechanism in conjunction with CBC padding, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via a padding-oracle attack, aka a Vaudenay attack.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2016-4379"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2016-09-08T16:59:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The TLS implementation in HPE Integrated Lights-Out 3 (aka iLO3) firmware before 1.88 does not properly use a MAC protection mechanism in conjunction with CBC padding, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via a padding-oracle attack, aka a Vaudenay attack.",
  "id": "GHSA-66rr-2jf5-q2c5",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T03:41:25Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T03:41:25Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-4379"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05249760"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.iacr.org/archive/eurocrypt2002/23320530/cbc02_e02d.pdf"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92696"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1036707"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.