GHSA-68GC-RMHH-C4GG

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:38 – Updated: 2022-05-24 17:38
VLAI?
Details

RsaPad_PSS in wolfcrypt/src/rsa.c in wolfSSL before 4.6.0 has an out-of-bounds write for certain relationships between key size and digest size.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2020-36177"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-787"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2021-01-06T16:15:00Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "RsaPad_PSS in wolfcrypt/src/rsa.c in wolfSSL before 4.6.0 has an out-of-bounds write for certain relationships between key size and digest size.",
  "id": "GHSA-68gc-rmhh-c4gg",
  "modified": "2022-05-24T17:38:06Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T17:38:06Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-36177"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/pull/3426"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/commit/63bf5dc56ccbfc12a73b06327361687091a4c6f7"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/commit/fb2288c46dd4c864b78f00a47a364b96a09a5c0f"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=26567"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/releases/tag/v4.6.0-stable"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…