GHSA-68JF-59Q2-C7W4

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 07:18 – Updated: 2022-05-01 07:18
VLAI?
Details

** DISPUTED ** PHP remote file inclusion vulnerability in includes/phpdig/libs/search_function.php in Jetbox CMS 2.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the relative_script_path parameter, a different vector than CVE-2006-2270. NOTE: this issue has been disputed, and as of 20060830, CVE analysis concurs with the dispute. In addition, it is likely that the vulnerability is actually in a third party module, phpDig 1.8.8.

Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2006-4422"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2006-08-29T00:04:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "** DISPUTED **  PHP remote file inclusion vulnerability in includes/phpdig/libs/search_function.php in Jetbox CMS 2.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the relative_script_path parameter, a different vector than CVE-2006-2270. NOTE: this issue has been disputed, and as of 20060830, CVE analysis concurs with the dispute.  In addition, it is likely that the vulnerability is actually in a third party module, phpDig 1.8.8.",
  "id": "GHSA-68jf-59q2-c7w4",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T07:18:26Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T07:18:26Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-4422"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/28588"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1016765"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.attrition.org/pipermail/vim/2006-August/000997.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.attrition.org/pipermail/vim/2006-August/001003.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/28299"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/444422/100/0/threaded"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/444527/100/0/threaded"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/444640/100/0/threaded"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/444740/100/0/threaded"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/444822/100/0/threaded"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/444826/100/0/threaded"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/19722"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.