GHSA-68W5-72RC-PGRC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-23 15:30 – Updated: 2025-12-23 15:30In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
veth: reduce XDP no_direct return section to fix race
As explain in commit fa349e396e48 ("veth: Fix race with AF_XDP exposing old or uninitialized descriptors") for veth there is a chance after napi_complete_done() that another CPU can manage start another NAPI instance running veth_pool(). For NAPI this is correctly handled as the napi_schedule_prep() check will prevent multiple instances from getting scheduled, but for the remaining code in veth_pool() this can run concurrent with the newly started NAPI instance.
The problem/race is that xdp_clear_return_frame_no_direct() isn't designed to be nested.
Prior to commit 401cb7dae813 ("net: Reference bpf_redirect_info via task_struct on PREEMPT_RT.") the temporary BPF net context bpf_redirect_info was stored per CPU, where this wasn't an issue. Since this commit the BPF context is stored in 'current' task_struct. When running veth in threaded-NAPI mode, then the kthread becomes the storage area. Now a race exists between two concurrent veth_pool() function calls one exiting NAPI and one running new NAPI, both using the same BPF net context.
Race is when another CPU gets within the xdp_set_return_frame_no_direct() section before exiting veth_pool() calls the clear-function xdp_clear_return_frame_no_direct().
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-68341"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-12-23T14:16:40Z",
"severity": null
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nveth: reduce XDP no_direct return section to fix race\n\nAs explain in commit fa349e396e48 (\"veth: Fix race with AF_XDP exposing\nold or uninitialized descriptors\") for veth there is a chance after\nnapi_complete_done() that another CPU can manage start another NAPI\ninstance running veth_pool(). For NAPI this is correctly handled as the\nnapi_schedule_prep() check will prevent multiple instances from getting\nscheduled, but for the remaining code in veth_pool() this can run\nconcurrent with the newly started NAPI instance.\n\nThe problem/race is that xdp_clear_return_frame_no_direct() isn\u0027t\ndesigned to be nested.\n\nPrior to commit 401cb7dae813 (\"net: Reference bpf_redirect_info via\ntask_struct on PREEMPT_RT.\") the temporary BPF net context\nbpf_redirect_info was stored per CPU, where this wasn\u0027t an issue. Since\nthis commit the BPF context is stored in \u0027current\u0027 task_struct. When\nrunning veth in threaded-NAPI mode, then the kthread becomes the storage\narea. Now a race exists between two concurrent veth_pool() function calls\none exiting NAPI and one running new NAPI, both using the same BPF net\ncontext.\n\nRace is when another CPU gets within the xdp_set_return_frame_no_direct()\nsection before exiting veth_pool() calls the clear-function\nxdp_clear_return_frame_no_direct().",
"id": "GHSA-68w5-72rc-pgrc",
"modified": "2025-12-23T15:30:40Z",
"published": "2025-12-23T15:30:40Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-68341"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a14602fcae17a3f1cb8a8521bedf31728f9e7e39"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c1ceabcb347d1b0f7e70a7384ec7eff3847b7628"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d0bd018ad72a8a598ae709588934135017f8af52"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.