ghsa-698c-2x4j-g9gq
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 01:10
Modified
2024-10-15 23:33
Severity ?
Summary
Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer in Apache Tomcat
Details
The HTTP/2 header parser in Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M11 and 8.5.0 to 8.5.6 entered an infinite loop if a header was received that was larger than the available buffer. This made a denial of service attack possible.
{ affected: [ { database_specific: { last_known_affected_version_range: "<= 9.0.0.M11", }, package: { ecosystem: "Maven", name: "org.apache.tomcat:tomcat", }, ranges: [ { events: [ { introduced: "9.0.0.M1", }, { fixed: "9.0.0.M12", }, ], type: "ECOSYSTEM", }, ], }, { package: { ecosystem: "Maven", name: "org.apache.tomcat:tomcat", }, ranges: [ { events: [ { introduced: "8.5.0", }, { fixed: "8.5.8", }, ], type: "ECOSYSTEM", }, ], }, ], aliases: [ "CVE-2016-6817", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-119", "CWE-835", ], github_reviewed: true, github_reviewed_at: "2022-07-06T19:47:31Z", nvd_published_at: "2017-08-10T22:29:00Z", severity: "HIGH", }, details: "The HTTP/2 header parser in Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M11 and 8.5.0 to 8.5.6 entered an infinite loop if a header was received that was larger than the available buffer. This made a denial of service attack possible.", id: "GHSA-698c-2x4j-g9gq", modified: "2024-10-15T23:33:07Z", published: "2022-05-14T01:10:16Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-6817", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/apache/tomcat/commit/079372fc7bac8e2e378942715c9ce26a4a72c07a", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/apache/tomcat/commit/85c63227edabbfb4f2f500fc557480a190135d21", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://web.archive.org/web/20200227174145/http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94462", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://web.archive.org/web/20180115024458/http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037330", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20180607-0001", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/b5e3f51d28cd5d9b1809f56594f2cf63dcd6a90429e16ea9f83bbedc@%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/b5e3f51d28cd5d9b1809f56594f2cf63dcd6a90429e16ea9f83bbedc%40%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/a9f24571460af003071475b75f18cad81ebcc36fa7c876965a75e32a@%3Cannounce.tomcat.apache.org%3E", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/a9f24571460af003071475b75f18cad81ebcc36fa7c876965a75e32a%40%3Cannounce.tomcat.apache.org%3E", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/88855876c33f2f9c532ffb75bfee570ccf0b17ffa77493745af9a17a@%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/88855876c33f2f9c532ffb75bfee570ccf0b17ffa77493745af9a17a%40%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6af47120905aa7d8fe12f42e8ff2284fb338ba141d3b77b8c7cb61b3@%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6af47120905aa7d8fe12f42e8ff2284fb338ba141d3b77b8c7cb61b3%40%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/343558d982879bf88ec20dbf707f8c11255f8e219e81d45c4f8d0551@%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/343558d982879bf88ec20dbf707f8c11255f8e219e81d45c4f8d0551%40%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E", }, { type: "PACKAGE", url: "https://github.com/apache/tomcat", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94462", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037330", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], summary: "Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer in Apache Tomcat", }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.