GHSA-6C74-8P8J-4QV8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-04-16 15:34 – Updated: 2025-10-31 21:30
VLAI?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
exfat: fix missing shutdown check
xfstests generic/730 test failed because after deleting the device that still had dirty data, the file could still be read without returning an error. The reason is the missing shutdown check in ->read_iter.
I also noticed that shutdown checks were missing from ->write_iter, ->splice_read, and ->mmap. This commit adds shutdown checks to all of them.
Severity ?
5.5 (Medium)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-22076"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-04-16T15:16:01Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nexfat: fix missing shutdown check\n\nxfstests generic/730 test failed because after deleting the device\nthat still had dirty data, the file could still be read without\nreturning an error. The reason is the missing shutdown check in\n-\u003eread_iter.\n\nI also noticed that shutdown checks were missing from -\u003ewrite_iter,\n-\u003esplice_read, and -\u003emmap. This commit adds shutdown checks to all\nof them.",
"id": "GHSA-6c74-8p8j-4qv8",
"modified": "2025-10-31T21:30:55Z",
"published": "2025-04-16T15:34:42Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22076"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/47e35366bc6fa3cf189a8305bce63992495f3efa"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4a9595eb024b8319957c178be3cdeed613ac0795"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/539147585ca453db6e3d7a5cf3b9c9690513762d"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e41e33eb795cb9c1ead6ac627d8710546fac6e81"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…