ghsa-6g54-r3q8-8jvq
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-24 19:04
Modified
2022-05-24 19:04
Details

NGINX before 1.13.6 has a buffer overflow for years that exceed four digits, as demonstrated by a file with a modification date in 1969 that causes an integer overflow (or a false modification date far in the future), when encountered by the autoindex module.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2017-20005"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-190"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2021-06-06T22:15:00Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "NGINX before 1.13.6 has a buffer overflow for years that exceed four digits, as demonstrated by a file with a modification date in 1969 that causes an integer overflow (or a false modification date far in the future), when encountered by the autoindex module.",
  "id": "GHSA-6g54-r3q8-8jvq",
  "modified": "2022-05-24T19:04:16Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T19:04:16Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-20005"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/nginx/nginx/commit/0206ebe76f748bb39d9de4dd4b3fce777fdfdccf"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/nginx/nginx/commit/b900cc28fcbb4cf5a32ab62f80b59292e1c85b4b"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/06/msg00009.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210805-0006"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://trac.nginx.org/nginx/ticket/1368"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://nginx.org/en/CHANGES"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.