ghsa-6g95-x6cj-mg4v
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 03:20
Modified
2024-09-18 19:57
Summary
Django database denial-of-service with ModelMultipleChoiceField
Details

ModelMultipleChoiceField in Django 1.6.x before 1.6.10 and 1.7.x before 1.7.3, when show_hidden_initial is set to True, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service by submitting duplicate values, which triggers a large number of SQL queries.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "Django"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "1.6"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.6.10"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "Django"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "1.7"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.7.3"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2015-0222"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-770"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2024-04-29T16:34:17Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2015-01-16T16:59:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "ModelMultipleChoiceField in Django 1.6.x before 1.6.10 and 1.7.x before 1.7.3, when show_hidden_initial is set to True, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service by submitting duplicate values, which triggers a large number of SQL queries.",
  "id": "GHSA-6g95-x6cj-mg4v",
  "modified": "2024-09-18T19:57:21Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T03:20:50Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-0222"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/django/django/commit/bcfb47780ce7caecb409a9e9c1c314266e41d392"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/django/django/commit/d7a06ee7e571b6dad07c0f5b519b1db02e2a476c"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/django/django"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/django/PYSEC-2015-7.yaml"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20161201073154/http://secunia.com/advisories/62285"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20161201073337/http://secunia.com/advisories/62309"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2015/jan/13/security"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2015-0026.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-January/148485.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-January/148608.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-January/148696.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2015-04/msg00001.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2015-09/msg00035.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://ubuntu.com/usn/usn-2469-1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2015:109"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Django database denial-of-service with ModelMultipleChoiceField"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.