GHSA-6GGC-83V2-V33W
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 23:56 – Updated: 2022-05-01 23:56
VLAI?
Details
Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in index.php in BlognPlus (BURO GUN +) 2.5.5 MySQL and PostgreSQL editions allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the (1) p, (2) e, (3) d, and (4) m parameters, a different vulnerability than CVE-2008-2819.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2008-3090"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-89"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2008-07-09T19:33:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in index.php in BlognPlus (BURO GUN +) 2.5.5 MySQL and PostgreSQL editions allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the (1) p, (2) e, (3) d, and (4) m parameters, a different vulnerability than CVE-2008-2819.",
"id": "GHSA-6ggc-83v2-v33w",
"modified": "2022-05-01T23:56:24Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T23:56:24Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-3090"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/43592"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/43593"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/30959"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://vuln.sg/blognplus255-en.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.blogn.org/index.php?e=171"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/30104"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…