ghsa-6hfw-45v2-4p3j
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 02:19
Modified
2022-05-14 02:19
Severity ?
Details
libcli/smb/smbXcli_base.c in Samba 4.x before 4.2.14, 4.3.x before 4.3.11, and 4.4.x before 4.4.5 allows man-in-the-middle attackers to bypass a client-signing protection mechanism, and consequently spoof SMB2 and SMB3 servers, via the (1) SMB2_SESSION_FLAG_IS_GUEST or (2) SMB2_SESSION_FLAG_IS_NULL flag.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2016-2119" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-284", "CWE-94" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2016-07-07T15:59:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "libcli/smb/smbXcli_base.c in Samba 4.x before 4.2.14, 4.3.x before 4.3.11, and 4.4.x before 4.4.5 allows man-in-the-middle attackers to bypass a client-signing protection mechanism, and consequently spoof SMB2 and SMB3 servers, via the (1) SMB2_SESSION_FLAG_IS_GUEST or (2) SMB2_SESSION_FLAG_IS_NULL flag.", "id": "GHSA-6hfw-45v2-4p3j", "modified": "2022-05-14T02:19:45Z", "published": "2022-05-14T02:19:45Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-2119" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201805-07" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2016-2119.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-07/msg00060.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1486.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1487.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1494.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinjul2016-3090544.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/91700" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1036244" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.