ghsa-6p6q-g6w7-h5f9
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:52
Modified
2022-05-13 01:52
Severity ?
Details
An error in zone database reference counting can lead to an assertion failure if a server which is running an affected version of BIND attempts several transfers of a slave zone in quick succession. This defect could be deliberately exercised by an attacker who is permitted to cause a vulnerable server to initiate zone transfers (for example: by sending valid NOTIFY messages), causing the named process to exit after failing the assertion test. Affects BIND 9.12.0 and 9.12.1.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2018-5736" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2019-01-16T20:29:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "An error in zone database reference counting can lead to an assertion failure if a server which is running an affected version of BIND attempts several transfers of a slave zone in quick succession. This defect could be deliberately exercised by an attacker who is permitted to cause a vulnerable server to initiate zone transfers (for example: by sending valid NOTIFY messages), causing the named process to exit after failing the assertion test. Affects BIND 9.12.0 and 9.12.1.", "id": "GHSA-6p6q-g6w7-h5f9", "modified": "2022-05-13T01:52:54Z", "published": "2022-05-13T01:52:54Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-5736" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://kb.isc.org/docs/aa-01602" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20180926-0004" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/104386" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1040941" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.