ghsa-6q3f-fc2p-9rh3
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:07
Modified
2022-05-13 01:07
Severity ?
Details
In Open vSwitch (OvS) 2.7.0, while parsing an OFPT_QUEUE_GET_CONFIG_REPLY type OFP 1.0 message, there is a buffer over-read that is caused by an unsigned integer underflow in the function ofputil_pull_queue_get_config_reply10 in lib/ofp-util.c.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2017-9214"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-191"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2017-05-23T17:29:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "In Open vSwitch (OvS) 2.7.0, while parsing an OFPT_QUEUE_GET_CONFIG_REPLY type OFP 1.0 message, there is a buffer over-read that is caused by an unsigned integer underflow in the function `ofputil_pull_queue_get_config_reply10` in `lib/ofp-util.c`.",
"id": "GHSA-6q3f-fc2p-9rh3",
"modified": "2022-05-13T01:07:34Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:07:34Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-9214"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2418"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2553"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2648"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2665"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2692"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2698"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2727"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/02/msg00032.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev/2017-May/332711.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.