ghsa-6r88-384v-fg82
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:23
Modified
2022-05-13 01:23
Details
The crypto.generateCRMFRequest method in Mozilla Firefox before 28.0 and SeaMonkey before 2.25 does not properly validate a certain key type, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via vectors that trigger generation of a key that supports the Elliptic Curve ec-dual-use algorithm.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2014-1498", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-347", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2014-03-19T10:55:00Z", severity: "MODERATE", }, details: "The crypto.generateCRMFRequest method in Mozilla Firefox before 28.0 and SeaMonkey before 2.25 does not properly validate a certain key type, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via vectors that trigger generation of a key that supports the Elliptic Curve ec-dual-use algorithm.", id: "GHSA-6r88-384v-fg82", modified: "2022-05-13T01:23:27Z", published: "2022-05-13T01:23:27Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-1498", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=935618", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201504-01", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2014-03/msg00016.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2014-03/msg00017.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2014-03/msg00022.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2014-04/msg00016.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/2014/mfsa2014-18.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinapr2016-2952098.html", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.