GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-6V98-4PPH-JQ73

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-11 21:31 – Updated: 2026-09-13 09:32
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

mmc: via-sdmmc: cancel card-detect work on remove

Disabling the device interrupt and freeing the IRQ prevents new card-detect work from being queued, but carddet_work already queued by the handler can still run after via_sd_remove() returns. via_sdc_card_detect() recovers the host through container_of() and dereferences its MMIO base; once remove() returns the host can be freed, so that work would touch freed memory.

Cancel carddet_work after freeing the IRQ and before cancelling finish_bh_work, which the card-detect handler can also queue. carddet_work can re-enable the interrupt through via_reset_pcictrl(); mask it again afterwards.

This issue was found by an in-house static analysis tool and confirmed by manual code review.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-89441"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-09-11T20:19:24Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmmc: via-sdmmc: cancel card-detect work on remove\n\nDisabling the device interrupt and freeing the IRQ prevents new card-detect\nwork from being queued, but carddet_work already queued by the handler can\nstill run after via_sd_remove() returns. via_sdc_card_detect() recovers the\nhost through container_of() and dereferences its MMIO base; once remove()\nreturns the host can be freed, so that work would touch freed memory.\n\nCancel carddet_work after freeing the IRQ and before cancelling\nfinish_bh_work, which the card-detect handler can also queue. carddet_work\ncan re-enable the interrupt through via_reset_pcictrl(); mask it again\nafterwards.\n\nThis issue was found by an in-house static analysis tool and confirmed by\nmanual code review.",
  "id": "GHSA-6v98-4pph-jq73",
  "modified": "2026-09-13T09:32:12Z",
  "published": "2026-09-11T21:31:25Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-89441"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/57e5d877f898d5e5c9d672a77bb6bdd24f0d9bf5"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/eaca730c6f5e3609df62a0469fb789235a93d276"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f7ff3027ef004a331ef911a4886f12bc2e996037"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…