ghsa-6vgp-r5v2-7gfw
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-04 00:27
Modified
2022-05-04 00:27
Details

The GOST ENGINE in OpenSSL before 1.0.0f does not properly handle invalid parameters for the GOST block cipher, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via crafted data from a TLS client.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2012-0027"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2012-01-06T01:55:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The GOST ENGINE in OpenSSL before 1.0.0f does not properly handle invalid parameters for the GOST block cipher, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via crafted data from a TLS client.",
  "id": "GHSA-6vgp-r5v2-7gfw",
  "modified": "2022-05-04T00:27:43Z",
  "published": "2022-05-04T00:27:43Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-0027"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/Document.jsp?objectID=c03360041"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-01/msg00017.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://osvdb.org/78191"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/57353"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=ssg1S1004564"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2012:007"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20120104.txt"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.