ghsa-6vj9-gmh6-m57r
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-24 17:33
Modified
2022-05-24 17:33
Details

u'Possible buffer overflow in WIFI hal process due to usage of memcpy without checking length of destination buffer' in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile in QCM4290, QCS4290, QM215, QSM8350, SA6145P, SA6155, SA6155P, SA8155, SA8155P, SC8180X, SC8180XP, SDX55, SDX55M, SM4250, SM4250P, SM6115, SM6115P, SM6125, SM6250, SM6350, SM7125, SM7225, SM7250, SM7250P, SM8150, SM8150P, SM8250, SM8350, SM8350P, SXR2130, SXR2130P

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2020-11121"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-120"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2020-11-12T10:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "u\u0027Possible buffer overflow in WIFI hal process due to usage of memcpy without checking length of destination buffer\u0027 in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile in QCM4290, QCS4290, QM215, QSM8350, SA6145P, SA6155, SA6155P, SA8155, SA8155P, SC8180X, SC8180XP, SDX55, SDX55M, SM4250, SM4250P, SM6115, SM6115P, SM6125, SM6250, SM6350, SM7125, SM7225, SM7250, SM7250P, SM8150, SM8150P, SM8250, SM8350, SM8350P, SXR2130, SXR2130P",
  "id": "GHSA-6vj9-gmh6-m57r",
  "modified": "2022-05-24T17:33:29Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T17:33:29Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-11121"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.qualcomm.com/company/product-security/bulletins/november-2020-bulletin"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.