GHSA-6VMW-RRMP-Q45C

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 01:42 – Updated: 2022-05-17 01:42
VLAI?
Details

Multiple integer underflows in the icmLut_allocate function in International Color Consortium (ICC) Format library (icclib), as used in Ghostscript 9.06 and Argyll Color Management System, allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted (1) PostScript or (2) PDF file with embedded images, which triggers a heap-based buffer overflow. NOTE: this issue is also described as an array index error.

Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2012-4405"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2012-09-18T17:55:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Multiple integer underflows in the icmLut_allocate function in International Color Consortium (ICC) Format library (icclib), as used in Ghostscript 9.06 and Argyll Color Management System, allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted (1) PostScript or (2) PDF file with embedded images, which triggers a heap-based buffer overflow.  NOTE: this issue is also described as an array index error.",
  "id": "GHSA-6vmw-rrmp-q45c",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T01:42:17Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T01:42:17Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-4405"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012:1256"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2012-4405"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854227"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/78411"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://wiki.mageia.org/en/Support/Advisories/MGASA-2012-0301"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-09/msg00031.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-10/msg00001.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2012-10/msg00015.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1256.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/50719"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201412-17.xml"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2012:151"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2013:089"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2013:090"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/09/11/2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/55494"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1027517"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-1581-1"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.