GHSA-6W68-QF8P-27PH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-03 03:08 – Updated: 2022-05-03 03:08
VLAI?
Details
The BIND 4 and BIND 8.2.x stub resolver libraries, and other libraries such as glibc 2.2.5 and earlier, libc, and libresolv, use the maximum buffer size instead of the actual size when processing a DNS response, which causes the stub resolvers to read past the actual boundary ("read buffer overflow"), allowing remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash).
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2002-1146"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2002-10-11T04:00:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The BIND 4 and BIND 8.2.x stub resolver libraries, and other libraries such as glibc 2.2.5 and earlier, libc, and libresolv, use the maximum buffer size instead of the actual size when processing a DNS response, which causes the stub resolvers to read past the actual boundary (\"read buffer overflow\"), allowing remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash).",
"id": "GHSA-6w68-qf8p-27ph",
"modified": "2022-05-03T03:08:04Z",
"published": "2022-05-03T03:08:04Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2002-1146"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://distro.conectiva.com.br/atualizacoes/?id=a\u0026anuncio=000535"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.iss.net/security_center/static/10295.php"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/738331"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.mandrakesoft.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2004:009"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2002-197.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2002-258.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2003-022.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2003-212.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…