ghsa-6w68-qf8p-27ph
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-03 03:08
Modified
2022-05-03 03:08
Details
The BIND 4 and BIND 8.2.x stub resolver libraries, and other libraries such as glibc 2.2.5 and earlier, libc, and libresolv, use the maximum buffer size instead of the actual size when processing a DNS response, which causes the stub resolvers to read past the actual boundary ("read buffer overflow"), allowing remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash).
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2002-1146" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2002-10-11T04:00:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "The BIND 4 and BIND 8.2.x stub resolver libraries, and other libraries such as glibc 2.2.5 and earlier, libc, and libresolv, use the maximum buffer size instead of the actual size when processing a DNS response, which causes the stub resolvers to read past the actual boundary (\"read buffer overflow\"), allowing remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash).", "id": "GHSA-6w68-qf8p-27ph", "modified": "2022-05-03T03:08:04Z", "published": "2022-05-03T03:08:04Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2002-1146" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://distro.conectiva.com.br/atualizacoes/?id=a\u0026anuncio=000535" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.iss.net/security_center/static/10295.php" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/738331" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.mandrakesoft.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2004:009" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2002-197.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2002-258.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2003-022.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2003-212.html" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.