GHSA-6W8H-9VFJ-7934
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 19:57 – Updated: 2022-08-13 00:00
VLAI?
Details
The uv_rwlock_t fallback implementation for Windows XP and Server 2003 in libuv before 1.7.4 does not properly prevent threads from releasing the locks of other threads, which allows attackers to cause a denial of service (deadlock) or possibly have unspecified other impact by leveraging a race condition.
Severity ?
8.1 (High)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2014-9748"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-362"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2020-02-11T17:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The uv_rwlock_t fallback implementation for Windows XP and Server 2003 in libuv before 1.7.4 does not properly prevent threads from releasing the locks of other threads, which allows attackers to cause a denial of service (deadlock) or possibly have unspecified other impact by leveraging a race condition.",
"id": "GHSA-6w8h-9vfj-7934",
"modified": "2022-08-13T00:00:31Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T19:57:27Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-9748"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/libuv/libuv/issues/515"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/libuv/libuv/pull/516"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/2723"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/libuv/KyNnGEXR0OA/NWb605ev2LUJ"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/libuv/WO2cl9zasN8"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…