GHSA-6WCV-9326-M4QG

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-09 03:31 – Updated: 2025-12-09 03:31
VLAI?
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

blk-iocost: fix divide by 0 error in calc_lcoefs()

echo max of u64 to cost.model can cause divide by 0 error.

# echo 8:0 rbps=18446744073709551615 > /sys/fs/cgroup/io.cost.model

divide error: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP RIP: 0010:calc_lcoefs+0x4c/0xc0 Call Trace: ioc_refresh_params+0x2b3/0x4f0 ioc_cost_model_write+0x3cb/0x4c0 ? _copy_from_iter+0x6d/0x6c0 ? kernfs_fop_write_iter+0xfc/0x270 cgroup_file_write+0xa0/0x200 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x17d/0x270 vfs_write+0x414/0x620 ksys_write+0x73/0x160 __x64_sys_write+0x1e/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

calc_lcoefs() uses the input value of cost.model in DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL, overflow would happen if bps plus IOC_PAGE_SIZE is greater than ULLONG_MAX, it can cause divide by 0 error.

Fix the problem by setting basecost

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-53783"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-12-09T01:16:49Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nblk-iocost: fix divide by 0 error in calc_lcoefs()\n\necho max of u64 to cost.model can cause divide by 0 error.\n\n  # echo 8:0 rbps=18446744073709551615 \u003e /sys/fs/cgroup/io.cost.model\n\n  divide error: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP\n  RIP: 0010:calc_lcoefs+0x4c/0xc0\n  Call Trace:\n   \u003cTASK\u003e\n   ioc_refresh_params+0x2b3/0x4f0\n   ioc_cost_model_write+0x3cb/0x4c0\n   ? _copy_from_iter+0x6d/0x6c0\n   ? kernfs_fop_write_iter+0xfc/0x270\n   cgroup_file_write+0xa0/0x200\n   kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x17d/0x270\n   vfs_write+0x414/0x620\n   ksys_write+0x73/0x160\n   __x64_sys_write+0x1e/0x30\n   do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80\n   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd\n\ncalc_lcoefs() uses the input value of cost.model in DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL,\noverflow would happen if bps plus IOC_PAGE_SIZE is greater than\nULLONG_MAX, it can cause divide by 0 error.\n\nFix the problem by setting basecost",
  "id": "GHSA-6wcv-9326-m4qg",
  "modified": "2025-12-09T03:31:10Z",
  "published": "2025-12-09T03:31:10Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-53783"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3538ade9d8c2ba41088e395de916f2599fadba8f"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6e291810fe83a384700eb24a1f714966391ed562"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/984af1e66b4126cf145153661cc24c213e2ec231"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9e8bf9f95f7a299fa9ea45b678d001806ad5e12c"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b96d7b4a9745fbd0c8384608ceb1f50415e862fa"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bf8eb1fd6110871e6232e8e7efe399276ef7e6f6"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…