GHSA-72GC-J98M-W58X

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 18:13 – Updated: 2022-05-01 18:13
VLAI?
Details

Stack-based buffer overflow in Lhaca File Archiver before 1.21 allows user-assisted remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted LZH archive, as exploited by malware such as Trojan.Lhdropper.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2007-3375"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-119"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2007-06-25T20:30:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Stack-based buffer overflow in Lhaca File Archiver before 1.21 allows user-assisted remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted LZH archive, as exploited by malware such as Trojan.Lhdropper.",
  "id": "GHSA-72gc-j98m-w58x",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T18:13:10Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T18:13:10Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-3375"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/35116"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/25826"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://vuln.sg/lhaca121-en.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/871497"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/24604"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.symantec.com/enterprise/security_response/weblog/2007/06/beware_of_lzh.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.symantec.com/security_response/writeup.jsp?docid=2007-062506-5500-99\u0026tabid=1"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…