GHSA-7555-MCJ4-25R2

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-10 15:33 – Updated: 2026-08-14 00:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net/mlx5: Fix MCIA register buffer overflow on 32 dword reads

The MCIA register can return up to 32 dwords (128 bytes) when the device advertises the mcia_32dwords capability, but struct mlx5_ifc_mcia_reg_bits only defines dword_0..11, leaving room for just 12 dwords (48 bytes) of data.

mlx5_query_mcia() clamps the read size to mlx5_mcia_max_bytes() and then memcpy()s that many bytes out of the register, potentially reading past the end of the 'out' buffer. On kernels built with FORTIFY_SOURCE this is caught as a buffer overflow while reading the module EEPROM via ethtool:

detected buffer overflow in memcpy kernel BUG at lib/string_helpers.c:1048! RIP: 0010:fortify_panic+0x13/0x20 Call Trace: mlx5_query_mcia.isra.0+0x200/0x210 [mlx5_core] mlx5_query_module_eeprom_by_page+0x4a/0xa0 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_get_module_eeprom_by_page+0xbb/0x120 [mlx5_core] eeprom_prepare_data+0xf3/0x170 ethnl_default_doit+0xf1/0x3b0

Extend the mcia_reg layout to 32 dwords.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-68293"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-10T13:20:18Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet/mlx5: Fix MCIA register buffer overflow on 32 dword reads\n\nThe MCIA register can return up to 32 dwords (128 bytes) when the device\nadvertises the mcia_32dwords capability, but struct\nmlx5_ifc_mcia_reg_bits only defines dword_0..11, leaving room for just\n12 dwords (48 bytes) of data.\n\nmlx5_query_mcia() clamps the read size to mlx5_mcia_max_bytes() and then\nmemcpy()s that many bytes out of the register, potentially reading past\nthe end of the \u0027out\u0027 buffer. On kernels built with FORTIFY_SOURCE this\nis caught as a buffer overflow while reading the module EEPROM via\nethtool:\n\n  detected buffer overflow in memcpy\n  kernel BUG at lib/string_helpers.c:1048!\n  RIP: 0010:fortify_panic+0x13/0x20\n  Call Trace:\n   mlx5_query_mcia.isra.0+0x200/0x210 [mlx5_core]\n   mlx5_query_module_eeprom_by_page+0x4a/0xa0 [mlx5_core]\n   mlx5e_get_module_eeprom_by_page+0xbb/0x120 [mlx5_core]\n   eeprom_prepare_data+0xf3/0x170\n   ethnl_default_doit+0xf1/0x3b0\n\nExtend the mcia_reg layout to 32 dwords.",
  "id": "GHSA-7555-mcj4-25r2",
  "modified": "2026-08-14T00:31:54Z",
  "published": "2026-08-10T15:33:45Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-68293"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/11c057d23465c7a5817a7284c896d19d54c0b616"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5be4eebd5a3a198dab0adcd550e1cadca79bdfed"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/87b39a8c875ca744b7de69af0a8ef8874cffccf1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/88b2a16ddac3357e3f1d528e758b51e2c945d546"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…