ghsa-755h-qpqx-6774
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 01:55
Modified
2022-05-17 01:55
Details
The authentication process in Adobe ColdFusion before 10 does not require knowledge of the cleartext password if the password hash is known, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to obtain administrative privileges by leveraging read access to the configuration file, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-2861.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2010-5290" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2013-09-20T16:55:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "The authentication process in Adobe ColdFusion before 10 does not require knowledge of the cleartext password if the password hash is known, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to obtain administrative privileges by leveraging read access to the configuration file, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-2861.", "id": "GHSA-755h-qpqx-6774", "modified": "2022-05-17T01:55:46Z", "published": "2022-05-17T01:55:46Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-5290" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/87740" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://osvdb.org/97553" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://qualys.immunityinc.com/home/exploitpack/CANVAS/CF_directory_traversal" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/coldfusion-directory-traversal-faq-cve-2010-2861" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.