GHSA-755H-QPQX-6774
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 01:55 – Updated: 2025-04-11 04:14
VLAI?
Details
The authentication process in Adobe ColdFusion before 10 does not require knowledge of the cleartext password if the password hash is known, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to obtain administrative privileges by leveraging read access to the configuration file, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-2861.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2010-5290"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2013-09-20T16:55:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The authentication process in Adobe ColdFusion before 10 does not require knowledge of the cleartext password if the password hash is known, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to obtain administrative privileges by leveraging read access to the configuration file, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-2861.",
"id": "GHSA-755h-qpqx-6774",
"modified": "2025-04-11T04:14:04Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T01:55:46Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-5290"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/87740"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://osvdb.org/97553"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://qualys.immunityinc.com/home/exploitpack/CANVAS/CF_directory_traversal"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/coldfusion-directory-traversal-faq-cve-2010-2861"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…