ghsa-762m-frp4-phf3
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 04:56
Modified
2022-05-17 04:56
Details
xslt.c in libxslt before 1.1.25 allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a stylesheet that embeds a DTD, which causes a structure to be accessed as a different type. NOTE: this issue is due to an incomplete fix for CVE-2012-2825.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2013-4520", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2013-12-14T20:55:00Z", severity: "MODERATE", }, details: "xslt.c in libxslt before 1.1.25 allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a stylesheet that embeds a DTD, which causes a structure to be accessed as a different type. NOTE: this issue is due to an incomplete fix for CVE-2012-2825.", id: "GHSA-762m-frp4-phf3", modified: "2022-05-17T04:56:16Z", published: "2022-05-17T04:56:16Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-4520", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849019", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://gitorious.org/libxslt/libxslt/commit/7089a62b8f133b42a2981cf1f920a8b3fe9a8caa", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2013/suse-su-20131654-1.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2013/suse-su-20131656-1.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2013/q4/238", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2013/q4/239", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/56072", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.osvdb.org/99671", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.