ghsa-769v-gfhq-g2w7
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:04
Modified
2022-05-13 01:04
Severity ?
Details
The resolver in nginx before 1.8.1 and 1.9.x before 1.9.10 does not properly limit CNAME resolution, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (worker process resource consumption) via vectors related to arbitrary name resolution.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2016-0747" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-400" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2016-02-15T19:59:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "The resolver in nginx before 1.8.1 and 1.9.x before 1.9.10 does not properly limit CNAME resolution, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (worker process resource consumption) via vectors related to arbitrary name resolution.", "id": "GHSA-769v-gfhq-g2w7", "modified": "2022-05-13T01:04:26Z", "published": "2022-05-13T01:04:26Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-0747" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:1425" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bto.bluecoat.com/security-advisory/sa115" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302589" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201606-06" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://support.apple.com/kb/HT212818" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-02/msg00042.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://mailman.nginx.org/pipermail/nginx/2016-January/049700.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2021/Sep/36" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3473" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1034869" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2892-1" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.