ghsa-769v-gfhq-g2w7
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:04
Modified
2022-05-13 01:04
Severity ?
Details
The resolver in nginx before 1.8.1 and 1.9.x before 1.9.10 does not properly limit CNAME resolution, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (worker process resource consumption) via vectors related to arbitrary name resolution.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2016-0747"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-400"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2016-02-15T19:59:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The resolver in nginx before 1.8.1 and 1.9.x before 1.9.10 does not properly limit CNAME resolution, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (worker process resource consumption) via vectors related to arbitrary name resolution.",
"id": "GHSA-769v-gfhq-g2w7",
"modified": "2022-05-13T01:04:26Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:04:26Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-0747"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:1425"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bto.bluecoat.com/security-advisory/sa115"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302589"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201606-06"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://support.apple.com/kb/HT212818"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-02/msg00042.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://mailman.nginx.org/pipermail/nginx/2016-January/049700.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2021/Sep/36"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3473"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1034869"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2892-1"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading...
Loading...
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.