GHSA-775J-MPHJ-44X5

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-05-09 09:33 – Updated: 2025-11-17 15:30
VLAI?
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

fbdev: omapfb: Add 'plane' value check

Function dispc_ovl_setup is not intended to work with the value OMAP_DSS_WB of the enum parameter plane.

The value of this parameter is initialized in dss_init_overlays and in the current state of the code it cannot take this value so it's not a real problem.

For the purposes of defensive coding it wouldn't be superfluous to check the parameter value, because some functions down the call stack process this value correctly and some not.

For example, in dispc_ovl_setup_global_alpha it may lead to buffer overflow.

Add check for this value.

Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE static analysis tool.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-37851"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-674"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-05-09T07:16:06Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nfbdev: omapfb: Add \u0027plane\u0027 value check\n\nFunction dispc_ovl_setup is not intended to work with the value OMAP_DSS_WB\nof the enum parameter plane.\n\nThe value of this parameter is initialized in dss_init_overlays and in the\ncurrent state of the code it cannot take this value so it\u0027s not a real\nproblem.\n\nFor the purposes of defensive coding it wouldn\u0027t be superfluous to check\nthe parameter value, because some functions down the call stack process\nthis value correctly and some not.\n\nFor example, in dispc_ovl_setup_global_alpha it may lead to buffer\noverflow.\n\nAdd check for this value.\n\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE static\nanalysis tool.",
  "id": "GHSA-775j-mphj-44x5",
  "modified": "2025-11-17T15:30:31Z",
  "published": "2025-05-09T09:33:19Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-37851"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/09dbf22fd68c2f1a81ab89670ffa1ec3033436c4"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3e411827f31db7f938a30a3c7a7599839401ec30"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4efd8ef5e40f2c7a4a91a5a9f03140bfa827da89"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/52eafaa56f8f6d6a0cdff9282b25b4acbde34edc"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/660a53a0694d1f3789802509fe729dd4656fc5e0"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9b0a41589ee70529b20e1e0108d03f10c649bdc4"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a570efb4d877adbf3db2dc95487f2ba6bfdd148a"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cdf41d72e8b015d9ea68f5a1c0a79624e7c312aa"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fda15c5b96b883d62fb2d84a3a1422aa87717897"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/05/msg00030.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/05/msg00045.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…