ghsa-782g-wgjp-wr8j
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 04:01
Modified
2022-05-17 04:01
Details
CRLF injection vulnerability in the Ceph Object Gateway (aka radosgw or RGW) in Ceph before 0.94.4 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via a crafted bucket name.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2015-5245", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2015-12-03T20:59:00Z", severity: "MODERATE", }, details: "CRLF injection vulnerability in the Ceph Object Gateway (aka radosgw or RGW) in Ceph before 0.94.4 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via a crafted bucket name.", id: "GHSA-782g-wgjp-wr8j", modified: "2022-05-17T04:01:16Z", published: "2022-05-17T04:01:16Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-5245", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015:2066", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015:2512", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-5245", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261606", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://lists.ceph.com/pipermail/ceph-announce-ceph.com/2015-October/000034.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/12537", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.