ghsa-7843-hchm-wf25
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 23:31
Modified
2022-05-01 23:31
Details
The ExpandCert function in Apache-SSL before apache_1.3.41+ssl_1.59 does not properly handle (1) '/' and (2) '=' characters in a Distinguished Name (DN) in a client certificate, which might allow remote attackers to bypass authentication via a crafted DN that triggers overwriting of environment variables.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2008-0555"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-287"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2008-04-04T00:44:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The ExpandCert function in Apache-SSL before apache_1.3.41+ssl_1.59 does not properly handle (1) \u0027/\u0027 and (2) \u0027=\u0027 characters in a Distinguished Name (DN) in a client certificate, which might allow remote attackers to bypass authentication via a crafted DN that triggers overwriting of environment variables.",
"id": "GHSA-7843-hchm-wf25",
"modified": "2022-05-01T23:31:26Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T23:31:26Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-0555"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/41618"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/29644"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/3797"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.apache-ssl.org/advisory-cve-2008-0555.txt"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.cynops.de/advisories/CVE-2008-0555.txt"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.klink.name/security/aklink-sa-2008-005-apache-ssl.txt"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/490386/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/28576"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1019784"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/1079/references"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading...
Loading...
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.