GHSA-78J5-GCMF-VQC8

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2019-05-29 18:02 – Updated: 2021-10-06 22:02
VLAI?
Summary
Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in Verdaccio
Details

Impact

What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?

Cross-Site Scripting XSS, malicious packages with content Javascript that might be executed in the User Interface stealing user credentials.

Patches

Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?

Users that still using v3 must upgrade to >3.12.0 or those have no problem to migrate to a major version >=4.0.0 also fix the issue.

Workarounds

Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?

No, the users must update.

References

Are there any links users can visit to find out more?

https://www.npmjs.com/advisories/832 https://www.npmjs.com/advisories/833

The issue was reported by the NPMJS Security Team

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory: * Read the Security Policy to find the ways to be in contact with us.

Severity ?
6.1 (Medium)
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "verdaccio"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "3.12.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2019-14772"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-79"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2020-05-28T21:00:51Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Impact\nWhat kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?\n\nCross-Site Scripting XSS, malicious packages with content Javascript that might be executed in the User Interface stealing user credentials. \n\n### Patches\nHas the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?\n\nUsers that still using `v3` must upgrade to **\u003e3.12.0** or those have no problem to migrate to a major version **\u003e=4.0.0** also fix the issue.\n\n### Workarounds\nIs there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?\n\nNo, the users must update.\n\n### References\nAre there any links users can visit to find out more?\n\nhttps://www.npmjs.com/advisories/832\nhttps://www.npmjs.com/advisories/833\n\nThe issue was reported by the NPMJS Security Team\n\n### For more information\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory:\n* Read the Security Policy to find the ways to be in contact with us.\n",
  "id": "GHSA-78j5-gcmf-vqc8",
  "modified": "2021-10-06T22:02:18Z",
  "published": "2019-05-29T18:02:59Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/verdaccio/verdaccio/security/advisories/GHSA-78j5-gcmf-vqc8"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-14772"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/verdaccio/verdaccio"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.npmjs.com/advisories/832"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.npmjs.com/advisories/833"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in Verdaccio"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.