GHSA-798Q-JPVF-XQWG
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-03 03:07 – Updated: 2022-05-03 03:07
VLAI?
Details
Buffer overflow in print-rx.c of tcpdump 3.x (probably 3.6x) allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code via AFS RPC packets with invalid lengths that trigger an integer signedness error, a different vulnerability than CVE-2000-1026.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2001-1279"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2001-07-17T04:00:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Buffer overflow in print-rx.c of tcpdump 3.x (probably 3.6x) allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code via AFS RPC packets with invalid lengths that trigger an integer signedness error, a different vulnerability than CVE-2000-1026.",
"id": "GHSA-798q-jpvf-xqwg",
"modified": "2022-05-03T03:07:15Z",
"published": "2022-05-03T03:07:15Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2001-1279"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://distro.conectiva.com.br/atualizacoes/?id=a\u0026anuncio=000480"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.iss.net/security_center/static/7006.php"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/797201"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/security/2002/MDKSA-2002-032.php"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2001-089.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/3065"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…